CASE #3:06-cv-00095-MCR-EMT - Appeal Case # 09-12234-C
I am very thankful for the American constitution which guarantees the pursuit of justice. Furthermore, Nomocracy simply means to me the rule of law which limits the discretion of officials, and provides a process by which errors or abuse of discretion can be corrected. We trust officials to exercise such discretion as they have with wisdom, justice, and competence, to avoid government that is arbitrary, insolent, discriminatory, prejudiced, intrusive and corrupt. However, can judges push the envelope of their discretion to the detriment of the Country's citizens? I believe, they can if left unchecked by watchful eyes. If such happens, it can send a tidal wave of bad publicity around the world. It was President Jimmy Carter who once said,
"The best way to enhance freedom in other lands is to demonstrate here that our democratic system is worthy of emulation." -Jimmy Carter
"Next to our right of liberty, the right of property is the most important individual right guaranteed by the Constitution." -William Taft, 1909-1913
"The three great rights are so bound together as to be essentially one right. To give a man his life, but deny him his liberty, is to take from him all that makes his life worth living. To give him his liberty, but take from him the property which is the fruit and badge of his liberty, is to still leave him a slave."
- George Sutherland, Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, 1921.
,
This post number 4 is the continuation of the Gulf Case Saga on the Gulf of Mexico. This is an actual case unfolding right now in the appeal phase. I applaud George Sutherland's quote above for indeed, property is the badge of a man's liberty. Why was my property taken away from me in America with impunity on those who committed the harm? Why is there no correction of those violations still now after more than four years and despite the overwhelming evidence? Why should the negro continue to suffer despite his extra effort to pursue and achieve the American dream? Why are loose canons left unchecked and unsupervised to demoralized innocent citizens and threaten the prosperity of our Country? The reader is cautioned to pay close attention to each post as together they unravel a legal mystery. As stated in the previous post, the GULF CASE is not fiction but it is about first and foremost the violation of property rights against an African american family and against Property rights policies upheld by the Supreme Courts and the Justice Department. It is the true story of an African-American family and their total demise on American soil due to injustice in 2009. After approximately 25 years of successful development and wonderful achievements, as a former Department of Defense Contractor, an African-American real estate developer was ravaged and devastated by a lower Government namely the walton County on the Gulf of Mexico and the plaintiffs' case was worsened by a deadly blow from a Federal Judge who after 379 motions and attorney entries, three years of debate, an array of depositions, and a plethora of lies, deceits, misleadings, inconsistencies and falsehood, issued an incoherent order to make bad matter worse. Unchecked properly by superiors, the judge has done the unthinkable against what she stated before she would never do meaning to make the public afraid of the court. This saga entails romance, intrigues, dangers and the eventual demise of an African-American family who watched their American Dream turn to an American nightmare on American soil, after following the rules and working their tail off for approximately 25 years. Would you call this a judicial oversight, judicial discretion or plain injustice? Speak loud America and respond lest this becomes the norm under this historic administration which does not stand for injustice. We will analyze one of these incoherences among many in this blog.
INCOHERENCE # 6: On March 2004, Plaintiff Sony Roy was issued a Development Order by the Walton County to develop the parcel of land and erect a fence (Concrete, wood or iron fence). Plaintiff Sony Roy executed the development order to the letter of the law and to the satisfaction of the County and obtained his letter of credit back attesting that his development was to the satisfaction of the County. The Development Order was completely satisfied on December 14, 2004. Proof available upon request.
Yet, on May 11, 2005, the County sent two employees to stop the Plaintiff's work on the basis that his wall needed a building permit and his D/O needed to be posted in from of his property.
That this is inconsistent with the pursuit of Justice in America is a matter of fact and a subject of law. With overwhelming proofs of the go aheads and the engineered blueprint and the Stoppel Letter supplied by the Walton County there is no denial of the of the injustice that took place on American Soil.
This African-American family needs an amicus desperately as their case stands in appellate court right now. We appeal to any Friend of the court who can issue that Amicus to let the court know that other eyes are scrutinizing the unfolding of this case closely to do so as soon as possible. You may contact Sony Roy at (240) 786-8637 or email him at mybafu@gmail.com. Any bipartisan efforts will be greatly appreciated.
Please leave us your comments or your support below.
This is a bog by BAFU USA standing for Bounce Back America From Unemployment. For more information about the BAFU Presidential Registry click here.
For information about BAFU's diligent work on behalf of the unemployed, click here.
Sony Roy, Author and plaintiff
With all due respect is available for
possible interviews on this blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment